Is it a misstep that we’ve only now seen Himala? For years, we had heard of its reputation but never took the time to experience it. Over the holidays, spurred by the frustration of missing this year’s Isang Himala (a 2024 MMFF entry based on the film), we decided it was finally time. Conveniently available on Netflix and YouTube, Himala proved not just easy to access, but profoundly resonant - even four decades after its release.
Set in the drought-stricken town of Cupang, the film tells the story of Elsa (Nora Aunor), a young woman who claims to have seen the Virgin Mary atop a hill during a solar eclipse. News of the apparition spreads, transforming Elsa into an international sensation and bringing prosperity to Cupang. However, as tragic events begin to unfold, Elsa’s miracles come into question, casting doubt on her visions and the fervor they inspire.
What makes Himala truly timeless is its stark relevance to today’s world. Despite the technical and societal advancements of the past 40 years, the same societal flaws depicted in Cupang - blind faith, mass hysteria, the manipulation of belief, and greed - persist. If anything, these issues have been exacerbated by the rapid dissemination of information (and misinformation) in the digital age. The film’s strength lies in its layered narrative, which can be appreciated both as a straightforward critique of religious fervor and as a broader commentary on the dangers of collective delusion.
Nora Aunor’s performance as Elsa is nothing short of extraordinary. Her restrained, quietly intense portrayal grounds the film, making Elsa both relatable and enigmatic. Aunor’s nuanced journey—from a simple girl to a figure burdened by fame and doubt - is captivating. Supporting performances also shine, particularly Laura Centeno as Chayong, whose unsettling smile and quiet anguish as person torn between belief and love leave a lasting impression. However, the film is not without its flaws, some of which reflect the limitations of its time. Certain transitions between scenes feel abrupt, and secondary characters occasionally appear or disappear just to push a purpose, disrupting the flow of the narrative. While these issues do not detract significantly from the film’s impact, they are worth noting. Ultimately, Himala is a masterpiece that has only grown in relevance and importance with age. Its themes resonate deeply, its performances remain unforgettable, and its haunting message lingers long after the credits roll.
Himala (1982) Review: Still Relevant Four Decades After
Comments
Post a Comment